- Cultural Shifts - http://culturalshifts.com -

A Spring Day in Toronto

Posted By Ben Walker On November 19, 2007 @ 7:59 pm In Audio & Visual Studies | 97 Comments


97 Comments (Open | Close)

97 Comments To "A Spring Day in Toronto"

#1 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 3:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.Much love. ..jc

#2 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#3 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#4 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#5 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#6 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#7 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#8 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#9 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#10 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#11 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#12 Comment By mejuan On April 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am

From YouTube: Man That IS beautiful….I’m very inspired. Thank you.
Much love. ..jc

#13 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 8:29 am

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#14 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 10:31 am

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#15 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#16 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#17 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#18 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#19 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#20 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#21 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#22 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#23 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#24 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#25 Comment By PlanetEclipse1212 On May 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

From YouTube: i didnt think i would like it but now i do..thanks

#26 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#27 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#28 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#29 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#30 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#31 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#32 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#33 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#34 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#35 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#36 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#37 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#38 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#39 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#40 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#41 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#42 Comment By erakon1 On May 16, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

From YouTube: You can see a higher res version at benwalker(.)ca if you like. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.

#43 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 8:30 am

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#44 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#45 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#46 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#47 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#48 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#49 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#50 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#51 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#52 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#53 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#54 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#55 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#56 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#57 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#58 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#59 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#60 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#61 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#62 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#63 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#64 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#65 Comment By hillcrestG On August 22, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

From YouTube: wow, where did u get all that old footage??? or did u edit it to look old?

but nice film anyways, love toronto.

#66 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 2:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#67 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#68 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#69 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#70 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#71 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#72 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#73 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#74 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#75 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#76 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#77 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#78 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#79 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#80 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#81 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#82 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#83 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#84 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#85 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#86 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#87 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#88 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#89 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#90 Comment By erakon1 On August 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm

From YouTube: The film was shot in 2002. It was shot on kodak super 8mm. No post on it, most of the editing was in camera.

#91 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 3:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#92 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#93 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#94 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#95 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#96 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool

#97 Comment By vy10tex On October 16, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

From YouTube: wow this is actually pretty cool


Article printed from Cultural Shifts: http://culturalshifts.com

URL to article: http://culturalshifts.com/archives/146

URLs in this post:
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-Yw_XJYuVE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-Yw_XJYuVE

Copyright © 2008 Cultural Shift(s). All rights reserved.